8 Manufacturing Modes Approved for Microsoft Dynamics Business Central (BC)
pjoeckel • March 4, 2024
8 Manufacturing Modes Approved for Microsoft Dynamics Business Central (BC)
I have seen social media posts touting the eight modes of manufacturing that Microsoft Dynamics Business Central (BC) is approved for.
Here is the list:
BC is an excellent ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) platform when implemented in the right company. However, my thirty years of selecting, implementing, and fixing ERP manufacturing software gave me pause about this claim. Let us examine that “8-Modes” claim with a real-life, data-driven example. I recently had the opportunity to consult with a company that builds large, extraordinarily complex machines engineered to order, combining a mix of standard equipment, unique components, and process manufacturing. Once completed, the business installs and services its machinery.
The business posed the following question, “We are implementing Microsoft Dynamics Business Central (BC), but some recently hired resources are questioning if that is the right solution for us.”
After asking a couple of detailed questions regarding their manufacturing requirements, I knew immediately that they were headed for severe challenges with their implementation. The challenge, of course, was how to quantify that analysis so that team members already invested in the BC implementation would have fact-based, data-driven analytics on which to base their decisions. To deliver that highly granular, non-biased, data-driven analysis, I turned to a GYDE365-Discover session.
In a matter of days, not weeks or months, I delivered a detailed analysis to the business comparing the fit of core BC functionality against the critical manufacturing requirements. In a detailed report of more than one hundred pages of thorough analysis, here was the key takeaway: Company-wide, for critical must-have requirements, BC was a fit for 52% of those requirements.
Of course, the devil is in the details, but drilling down into the missing requirements, it was easy to see that BC, with its current feature set, is a sub-optimal fit.
By contrast, the fit of Microsoft Dynamics Finance and Supply Chain Management (FSCM) was evaluated at 89%. Suppose you need a fact-based, unbiased analysis of your manufacturing operations requirements compared to BC, FSCM, and any other ERP solution. In that case, a GYDE365-Discover report is the best methodology I have seen. Let us show you how and why with data, not opinions .
Here is the list:
- Job Shop Manufacturing
- Repetitive Job Shop Manufacturing
- Make-to-Order Manufacturing
- Configure-to-Order Manufacturing
- Make-to-Stock Manufacturing
- Process Manufacturing
- Engineer-to-Order Manufacturing
- Mixed Mode Manufacturing
BC is an excellent ERP (Enterprise Resource Planning) platform when implemented in the right company. However, my thirty years of selecting, implementing, and fixing ERP manufacturing software gave me pause about this claim. Let us examine that “8-Modes” claim with a real-life, data-driven example. I recently had the opportunity to consult with a company that builds large, extraordinarily complex machines engineered to order, combining a mix of standard equipment, unique components, and process manufacturing. Once completed, the business installs and services its machinery.
The business posed the following question, “We are implementing Microsoft Dynamics Business Central (BC), but some recently hired resources are questioning if that is the right solution for us.”
After asking a couple of detailed questions regarding their manufacturing requirements, I knew immediately that they were headed for severe challenges with their implementation. The challenge, of course, was how to quantify that analysis so that team members already invested in the BC implementation would have fact-based, data-driven analytics on which to base their decisions. To deliver that highly granular, non-biased, data-driven analysis, I turned to a GYDE365-Discover session.
In a matter of days, not weeks or months, I delivered a detailed analysis to the business comparing the fit of core BC functionality against the critical manufacturing requirements. In a detailed report of more than one hundred pages of thorough analysis, here was the key takeaway: Company-wide, for critical must-have requirements, BC was a fit for 52% of those requirements.
Of course, the devil is in the details, but drilling down into the missing requirements, it was easy to see that BC, with its current feature set, is a sub-optimal fit.
By contrast, the fit of Microsoft Dynamics Finance and Supply Chain Management (FSCM) was evaluated at 89%. Suppose you need a fact-based, unbiased analysis of your manufacturing operations requirements compared to BC, FSCM, and any other ERP solution. In that case, a GYDE365-Discover report is the best methodology I have seen. Let us show you how and why with data, not opinions .
With a GYDE365-Discover assessment, you'll receive an in-depth analysis report pack that includes:
- Recommended modules based on your company's processes
- Defined list and analysis of your company's requirements
- Gap/fit analysis to Dynamics Business Central and FSCM (easily benchmark to non-Microsoft ERP solutions if desired)
- Implementation project estimates, including timeline, budget, and licensing costs
- RFP/RFI-ready documents
- ...and much more!
The graphic below is for reference only. It is part of the LinkedIn post referenced in the blog.

HandsFree ERP is dedicated to supporting clients with their ERP initiatives, enabling companies to seamlessly connect users with their ERP partners. By utilizing skilled professionals, streamlined processes, and cutting-edge tools, HandsFree ERP significantly boosts the success rates of ERP projects.

By Peter Joeckel
•
September 11, 2025
Most organizations think data migration is about moving records from A to B. They're wrong. It's about transforming business information into operational truth. Get it wrong, and you're just digitizing your problems at enterprise scale. If you’re a distributor or manufacturer, your business runs on inventory. Simple as that. Everything else, sales, purchasing, operations, revolves around making sure your inventory data is accurate. And yet, so many companies struggle with messy, outdated, or outright incorrect data, setting themselves up for major headaches when it comes time to implement or upgrade an ERP system. For manufacturers and distributors, inventory is the heart of the business. Everything revolves around managing it effectively. In ERP terms, this involves three core processes: 1. Procure-to-Pay – Bringing inventory in from suppliers. 2. Manufacturing or Handling – Transforming or repackaging inventory. 3. Order-to-Cash – Shipping inventory out to customers. At the heart of the problem are three core data sets: customers, suppliers, and inventory . Clean and accurate data here isn’t optional. It’s essential. Let me paint you a picture of what poor data quality really costs: - Financial processes failing because customer master data is inconsistent - Supply chain grinding to a halt because item masters don't match across systems - Month-end closing taking weeks because nobody trusts the numbers - Compliance risks because audit trails are incomplete or incorrect I've seen implementations declare success after migrating millions of records, only to discover they've built a perfect system running on garbage data. The result? Unreliable reporting, broken processes, and users creating shadow systems to track "real" data. Here's what your implementation partner isn't telling you: Data quality issues compound over time. Every day you operate with poor data, you're creating new problems that will need to be fixed later. It's like trying to build a skyscraper on quicksand - no matter how perfect your architecture, IT IS GOING TO SINK. The hard truth: No amount of system optimization can fix bad data. You're either managing data quality now, or you're managing data problems forever. And in D365 F&O, forever gets expensive very quickly. Bills of Materials: The Science That Trips Everyone Up For manufacturers, one of the biggest trouble spots is the Bill of Materials (BOM) . Think of the BOM as a recipe: it defines exactly how components come together to make a finished product, like a “little red wagon.” Each part must be accounted for, structured correctly, and contain only inventory items. Here’s where things go wrong: Many BOMs have too many levels or include non-inventory items like labor and overhead. Legacy systems often force companies to create Frankenstein part numbers that are confusing and error-prone. Process manufacturers with “recipes” face additional complexity because ingredient quality can fluctuate, affecting output consistency. Moving this messy data into a modern ERP without cleaning it first can turn your new system into a nightmare rather than an improvement. Routing: Where Art Meets Science Beyond the BOM, there’s routing , the step-by-step instructions for manufacturing a product. Routing data is critical for understanding capacity, scheduling, and cost management. Capturing work center setup times, labor, material, and overhead costs is key. Most companies simply don’t have this data organized, which means ERP projects often start off on the wrong foot. Planning Ahead: The Key to ERP Success Waiting until the ERP project is live to clean and organize your data is a recipe for disaster. By then, your best engineers and data experts are fully occupied, leaving little time to fix deep-rooted issues. Forward-thinking manufacturers and distributors start data workshops well before the ERP implementation . These workshops: Identify issues in customer, supplier, and inventory data Clean and structure BOMs and routings properly Establish proper part numbering and chart of accounts setups Doing this ahead of time dramatically increases the chances of a smooth, successful ERP deployment—regardless of which system you choose. Bottom line: messy data doesn’t just slow you down, it can completely derail your ERP implementation. Start early, clean it up, and structure it correctly. Your future self (and your new ERP system) will thank you.