Industries like aerospace & defense, life sciences, and financial services routinely deliver initiatives as complex, or more complex, than ERP, yet with materially higher success rates.

Their advantage is not better software or bigger budgets, but discipline:

requirements are treated as decision-grade commitments
progress is gated by evidence
data integrity is validated upfront
independent parties are empowered to stop or redirect projects before risk becomes irreversible.

Failure is prevented early through structured risk reduction, not managed late through heroics.

If ERP projects adopted this discipline, the industry would fundamentally change. ERP would no longer be driven by optimism or feel-good assumption, vendor conviction, or timeline pressure.

Instead, it would be governed as a business-critical system change, where risk is quantified, decisions are validated independently, and execution only advances when readiness is proven. The result would be fewer big-bang failures, more predictable outcomes, and materially lower enterprise exposure.

CASE STUDY - Aerospace & Defense (Aircraft, Space, Weapons Systems)

Complexity level: Extreme

Failure tolerance: Near zero

Success rate: High because failure is unacceptable

Why they succeed

Requirements are frozen early and treated as contractual, not “fluid ideas”
Stage-gate governance: no phase advances without evidence
Independent verification & validation (IV&V) teams
Subsystem ownership is crystal clear
Change is expensive by design, so people think hard before requesting it

ERP lessons

✔ ERP requirements should be decision artifacts, not wish lists

✔ No phase progression without objective exit criteria

✔ Independent ERP assurance ≠ vendor QA

✔ Make customization painful enough to discourage casual scope creep

How to apply

Lock requirements at decision points (fit, build, deploy)
Independent “IV&V” role is a must (not SI, not ISV, not vendor)
Price change requests transparently and publicly

Why HandsFree ERP Makes It Different for ERP projects similar to A&D

HandsFree ERP applies the same complex-systems governance used in high-reliability industries directly to ERP decisions and delivery.

Framework-driven decisions replace subjective opinions
Independent verification replaces vendor self-validation.
Data diagnostics happen before commitments are made, not after problems surface.
AI is used to prioritize initiatives by value, effort, and risk not hype.
Executive risk governance replaces status reporting with real exposure visibility.

That combination is not traditional ERP consulting.

It is complex systems risk management applied to ERP and HandsFree ERP is not as another advisor in the process, but as the control mechanism that prevents ERP failure in the first place. We use tools, processes, frameworks and experts / people that are state-of-art and make data driven.

1. ERP Lifecycle Mapped to Aerospace & Pharma Phase Gates

This reframes ERP from “IT project” → regulated, high-risk system change.

Traditional ERP View (why it fails)

Discover → Design → Build → Test → Go-Live
Assumes progress = activity
Optimism-driven, vendor-led

High-Reliability Industry View and HandsFree ERP Framework & Tools

ERP Phase	Aerospace / Pharma Equivalent	What’s Actually Proven
Phase 0: Decision Readiness	Concept Feasibility / PreClinical	Business case viability, data integrity, organizational capacity
Phase 1: Fit & Risk Validation	Preliminary Design Review (PDR) / Phase I	Requirements realism, solution fit, risk exposure
Phase 2: Design Control	Critical Design Review (CDR) / Phase II	Scope stability, customization justification, integration feasibility
Phase 3: Build & Verification	System Integration / Phase III	Configuration integrity, process fidelity, data migration accuracy
Phase 4: Readiness & Cutover	Flight Readiness Review / Regulatory Approval	Operational readiness, rollback scenarios, economic exposure
Phase 5: Stabilization & Optimization	Post-Launch Surveillance	Performance validation, benefits realization, control maturity

Key shift:

👉 ERP phases advance only when evidence exists, not when timelines demand it.

2. ERP Independent Verification & Validation (IV&V) Operating Model

This is the missing role in most ERP programs and the reason other industries outperform ERP.

What IV&V Is (and is not)

Not:

Vendor QA
SI internal review
PMO status reporting
Steering committee opinion

Is:

Independent, evidence-based risk and decision validation
Accountable only to executives / board
Empowered to stop, slow, or redirect

ERP IV&V Core Functions

1. Decision Assurance

Validate requirements are decision-grade
Confirm assumptions are explicit and tested
Pressure-test vendor claims against reality

2. Risk Quantification

Translate ERP risks into financial, operational, and people impact
Identify silent failure modes (data, change fatigue, hidden dependencies)

3. Phase Gate Certification

Issue Go / Conditional Go / No-Go recommendations
Require objective exit criteria - not narratives

4. Change Control Oversight

Force cost, timeline, and risk transparency for every change
Prevent “death by a thousand enhancements”

5. Executive Signal Clarity

Strip noise from reporting
Replace green dashboards with truthful exposure summaries

Where IV&V Sits (Critically Important)

Board / Executive Sponsors

↑

IV&V ← Independent

↓

PMO / SI / Vendor / Internal Teams

IV&V never reports to delivery teams. Ever.

Why your Board Cares

ERP is a strategic asset enabling the business growth and there is a clear ROI. But it’s a system change that is risk-managed and insured.

ERP failures don’t come from bad software.

They come from unmanaged decision risk, invisible data risk, and optimism replacing evidence.”

Other industries facing comparable complexity - aerospace, pharma, financial services - do not allow:

Vendors to validate themselves
Progress without proof
Scope changes without economic consequences
Data readiness to be assumed

ERP projects still do.

ERP is not a technology implementation.

It is a business-critical system change with asymmetric downside risk.

Once live:

You can’t easily roll it back
Errors propagate instantly
Operational failure becomes enterprise failure

That makes ERP closer to aircraft certification than software deployment.

The Board’s Three Responsibilities (Often Missed)

1. Ensure Decision Quality Before Commitment

Are requirements real or inferred?
Is data fit-for-purpose?
Is capacity aligned with scope?

2. Demand Independent Risk Validation

Who benefits if the project continues?
Who is paid to stop it if it shouldn’t?

3. Control Risk, Not Just Spend

What are the downside scenarios?
What triggers escalation or pause?
What evidence must exist to proceed?

If we governed ERP the way we govern aircraft, drugs, or financial infrastructure, failure rates would collapse.

The reason they don’t isn’t complexity. It’s governance discipline.

HandsFree ERP operates just like the ERP Independent Verification & Validation function being unbiased with data driven frameworks and tools to drive the insurance for your ERP Project.

< Older Post